EFTA00623075Set 9
2016-06-0140p11,688w
litigant, his attorney or agent, cannot be
examined, absent rare and exceptional circumstances. Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vennette, 236 So.2d
108, 112 (Fla. 1970).
In Florida (as elsewhere), a party
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00623075.pdf
EFTA00221210Set 9
2008-09-1012p2,938w
prepare for trial. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure
1.280(b)(1); see also Surf Drugs, Inc., v. Vermette, 236 So.2d 108, 111 (Fla.
1970)(stating that the rules of discovery
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221210.pdf
EFTA00801563Set 9
2013-10-187p1,758w
Haddad. P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301• 954.467.1223
EFTA00801566
product. In Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1970), the Florida Supreme
Court provided
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00801563.pdf
EFTA01111246Set 9
2010-03-2330p8,316w
Exhibit 1.
Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d
108, 112 (Fla. 1970), gave this general definition of work product saying
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111246.pdf
EFTA00728126Set 9
2009-09-0211p3,091w
prepare for trial. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure
1.280(b)(1); see also Surf Drugs, Inc., v. Vermette, 236 So.2d 108, 111 (Fla.
1970)(stating that the rules of discovery
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00728126.pdf
EFTA00606624Set 9
2010-03-2332p8,686w
Exhibit 1.
Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d
108, 112 (Fla. 1970), gave this general definition of work product saying
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00606624.pdf
EFTA01069498Set 9
2010-03-2332p8,670w
Exhibit 1.
Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d
108, 112 (Fla. 1970), gave this general definition of work product saying
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01069498.pdf