""The Advisory Committee Notes to Rule"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

9 results for “"The Advisory Committee Notes to Rule"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

EFTA01091403Set 9

2009-04-3074p36,721w

speak directly to the judge." See Fed. R. Crim. P. 32, 2008 advisory committee note. This rule raises a number of issues about the scope of the victim's "right

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01091403.pdf

EFTA01071961Set 9

2013-08-3071p17,109w

settlement negotiations from discovery). Confirming the discoverability of plea discussions are the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 410. Advisory Committee explains that the Rule was originally drafted to forbid

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01071961.pdf

EFTA02729494Set 11

2019-09-1226p5,117w

secrecy, and that there request is structured to cover only ' As the Advisory Committee Notes explain, rule 6(e) "continues the traditional practice of secrecy on the part of members

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02729494.pdf

EFTA00221691Set 9

2009-01-2612p3,567w

follow in determining when such information is admissible at trial. The Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 412, Fed.R.Evid, makes clear that the procedures to determine admissibility of an alleged victim

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221691.pdf

EFTA00078646Set 9

2021-11-1916p4,502w

States v. Roti, 484 F.3d 934, 936 (7th Cir. 2007); see 2006 advisory committee note to Rule 408 (noting "statements made during compromise negotiations of other disputed claims

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00078646.pdf

EFTA01082123Set 9

2011-04-215p1,935w

good cause to produce work product statements taken soon after the occurrence); Advisory Committee Note to Rule 26(bX3) (noting that privilege may be overcome when the document records

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01082123.pdf

EFTA00072830Set 9

2005-10-208p1,191w

unfair prejudice, ... or by considerations of ... needless presentation of cumulative evidence." The Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 403 define "undue prejudice" as an "undue tendency to suggest decision

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00072830.pdf

EFTA00021944Set 8

2005-10-208p1,171w

unfair prejudice, ... or by considerations of ... needless presentation of cumulative evidence." The Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 403 define "undue prejudice" as an "undue tendency to suggest decision

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00021944.pdf

EFTA00306391Set 9

2011-05-246p2,559w

L.Ed 2d 263 (1990). 16 Id. (quoting the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 19(a) at 28 U. S. C. App., p. 595). 17 RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF CONTRACTS

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00306391.pdf

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

April 2009

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset9 total

Set 8

1

Set 9

7

Set 11

1