EFTA00078759Set 9
2004-06-284p2,130w
United States has offered evidence that such a
waiver in unenforceable in Canadian courts unless executed under the jurisdiction of those
courts. Such evidence is persuasive. . . . The waiver is retained ... waiver of extradition proceedings and consented to return voluntarily to the
United States. The Canadian Court then signed an Order to Convey, which directed the Royal
Canadian Mounted police ... that "it appear[ed] that such a waiver would have no effect in a Canadian court, and that if
the United States attempted to extradite [defendant] from Canada, [defendant] would
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00078759.pdf
EFTA00073070Set 9
47p24,346w
American Psychological Association Press. Pp. 105-117.
Loftus, E. F. (2003) Memory in Canadian Courts of Law. Canadian Psychology, 44, 207-212.
Lynn, S. J., Lock, T., Loftus, E.F., ICrackow
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00073070.pdf