EFTA01112407Set 9
2014-01-1637p15,664w
relief based upon
malicious prosecution or abuse of process. See Comment (a), Restatement of Torts, supra, § 587
California -- Hogen v. Valley Hosp., 147 Cal.App.3d 119, 195 Cal.Rptr ... Reconsideration
Page 5 of 13
282,] 768 A.2d 825, 833-34 (2001) ("The one tort excepted from the reach of the litigation
privilege is malicious prosecution, or malicious ... N.W.2d 571, 577-79 (2011)
("[B]ecause the elements of the tort [of malicious prosecution] are difficult to prove, it is
unnecessary to grant . . . absolute privilege. IT]here
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112407.pdf
EFTA01199647Set 9
2014-02-0639p15,944w
relief based upon
malicious prosecution or abuse of process. See Comment (a), Restatement of Torts, supra, § 587
California -- Hogen v. Valley Hosp., 147 Cal.App.3d 119, 195 Cal.Rptr ... Reconsideration
Page 5 of 13
282,] 768 A.2d 825, 833-34 (2001) ("The one tort excepted from the reach of the litigation
privilege is malicious prosecution, or malicious ... N.W.2d 571, 577-79 (2011)
("[B]ecause the elements of the tort [of malicious prosecution] are difficult to prove, it is
unnecessary to grant . . . absolute privilege. IT]here
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01199647.pdf
EFTA00282045Set 9
43p23,231w
LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN
ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH
THE SOFTWARE ... DISTRIBUTING THE SOFTWARE BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN
CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE ... HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY
WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00282045.pdf
EFTA01138929Set 9
2007-01-0633p8,537w
privilege, already applicable to defamatory
statements (slander and libel) and perjury, to all other torts so long as the
act complained of occurs during and has some relation ... District that the application of the privilege to
malicious prosecution claims would eliminate that tort as a cause of action. The Third
District found no merit to this argument, observing ... barred by the privilege:
We are unpersuaded by the argument that, unlike other torts, the
application of the litigation privilege to the tort of malicious prosecution
would effectively eliminate malicious
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01138929.pdf
EFTA01219759Set 9
113p46,694w
HOWEVER
CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE ... DISTRIBUTING THE
SOFTWARE BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT OR
OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE ... LIABLE FOR ANY
CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01219759.pdf
EFTA01177643Set 9
2012-06-167p3,570w
Document - by Citation - 1-22 Florida Torts § 22.05 6/16/12 9:35 AM
Switch Client I Preferences I Help I Sign Out
My LexisTM Search Get a Document Shepard's® More ... Advanced... Get a Document Go
View Tutorial
Service: Get by LEXSTAT®
TOC: Florida Torts > II. ACTIONS BASED ON INTENTIONAL CONDUCT > CHAPTER 22 MALICIOUS
PROSECUTION AND ABUSE OF PROCESS > A. Malicious ... Prosecution > § 22.05 Malice and Lack of
Probable Cause
Citation: 1-22 Florida Torts ® 22.05
1-22 Florida Torts § 22.05
Florida Torts
Copyright 2012, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01177643.pdf
EFTA00282089Set 9
17p7,172w
HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR
OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE ... HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT,
STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF
THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE ... LIABLE FOR ANY
CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE,
ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00282089.pdf
EFTA01105263Set 9
2004-10-0160p17,309w
1604650v1 12
EFTA01105274
equitable estoppel did not apply, the Fund would be liable in tort because this misconduct (non-
disclosure and misleading disclosure) constitutes fraud and breach of fiduciary duty ... Letter Agreement authorized only a complete
withdrawal, then FTC has a tort claim against the General Partner and the Fund, which is liable
for the torts committed by its agent ... duty at
a minimum. The damages for this claim exceed $80 million. FTC's tort theories are addressed
in Section H. B. See infra, at 33-39.
1. Promissory Estoppel
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01105263.pdf
EFTA01104798Set 9
2004-10-0160p17,336w
1604650v1 12
EFTA01104809
equitable estoppel did not apply, the Fund would be liable in tort because this misconduct (non-
disclosure and misleading disclosure) constitutes fraud and breach of fiduciary duty ... Letter Agreement authorized only a complete
withdrawal, then FTC has a tort claim against the General Partner and the Fund, which is liable
for the torts committed by its agent ... duty at
a minimum. The damages for this claim exceed $80 million. FTC's tort theories are addressed
in Section H. B. See infra, at 33-39.
1. Promissory Estoppel
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01104798.pdf
EFTA01177962Set 9
2012-06-14130p27,317w
book of business. How did
4 you know that?
5 A. Everyone in the tort world that I had spoke
6 to spoke extremely highly of Brad, not only people ... wanted him in there. We were trying to
12 develop a significant tort group and we thought that
13 he'd be a great part ... that about Brad?
15 A. It would have been other people in the tort
16 group. I don't want to guess, Tonja, as to which
17 other people told
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01177962.pdf
EFTA00619645Set 9
2012-06-14128p27,637w
book of business. How did
4 you know that?
5 A. Everyone in the tort world that I had spoke
6 to spoke extremely highly of Brad, not only people ... wanted him in there. We were trying to
12 develop a significant tort group and we thought that
13 he'd be a great part ... that about Brad?
15 A. It would have been other people in the tort
16 group. I don't want to guess, Tonja, as to which
17 other people told
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00619645.pdf
EFTA01178092Set 9
2012-06-1454p27,105w
book of business. How did
4 you know that?
5 A. Everyone in the tort world that I had spoke
6 to spoke extremely highly of Brad, not only people ... wanted him in there. We were trying to
12 develop a significant tort group and we thought that
13 he'd be a great part ... that about Brad?
15 A. It would have been other people in the tort
16 group. I don't want to guess, Tonja, as to which
17 other people told
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01178092.pdf
EFTA01130733Set 9
2012-06-1435p27,674w
business. 4 you know that?
5 Q. Yes. 5 A. Everyone in the tort world that I had spoke
6 A. David Boden, on the other hand ... significantly for that, if that helps you understand 12 develop a significant tort group and we thought that
13 the difference. 13 he'd be a great part ... more a 22 input at the gubernatorial level with regard to tort
3 market issue than anything else, how much arc judges 23 reform and the like, and there were
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01130733.pdf