EFTA01655482Set 10
2025-10-2813p7,872w
Near DNC, RNC Headquarters in 2021
• Continued Reporting: Video Shows What Happened After Wounded U-Haul Driver Left Bay Area Coast
Guard Base
• Continued Reporting: Idaho Teen Pleads Guilty ... shut down" the case in 2021.
Continued Reporting: Video Shows What Happened After Wounded U-Haul Driver Left Bay Area Coast
Guard Base
San Francisco Chronicle (10/27, Cassidy) reported that ... newly obtained surveillance video captured what occurred
after a U-Haul truck backed toward Coast Guard personnel at the entrance of Coast Guard Base Alameda,
prompting them to open fire
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01655482.pdf
EFTA00614554Set 9
5p3,653w
Paragraphs 9, 10, and II. And the key is the 5 McMurray versus U-Haul which is the Fourth
6 action was filed for the sole purpose to 6 District ... McMurray case versus 14 However, all appellee has done is file a
15 U-Haul which we have cited, 425 So.2nd 1208; 15 complaint and have process served upon
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00614554.pdf
EFTA01112467Set 9
2010-03-2327p8,263w
undue expenditure of time and money did not
constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4th
DCA 1983)(same); Blue v. Weinstein ... Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055; McMurray v.
U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (counterclaim for abuse of process was
properly dismissed with prejudice
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112467.pdf
EFTA00724269Set 9
5p3,674w
Paragraphs 9, 10, and II. And the key is the 5 McMurray versus U-Haul which is the Fourth
6 action was filed for the sole purpose to 6 District ... McMurray case versus 14 However, all appellee has done is file a
15 U-Haul which we have cited, 425 So.2nd 1208; 15 complaint and have process served upon
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00724269.pdf
EFTA01111213Set 9
2012-03-297p1,765w
claim is not in itself actionable as abuse of process, see, e.g.,
McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4'h DCA 1983); Blue v Weinstein ... immediate purpose other than that
for which it was designed. See, e.g., McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 and n. 1 (Fla. 4th
DCA 1983). Edwards, however
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111213.pdf
EFTA01112494Set 9
2010-03-2327p8,305w
undue expenditure of time and money did not
constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4th
DCA 1983)(same); Blue v. Weinstein ... Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055; McMurray v.
U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) (counterclaim for abuse of process was
properly dismissed with prejudice
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112494.pdf
EFTA01147552Set 9
2012-03-297p1,773w
claim is not in itself actionable as abuse of process, see, e.g.,
McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4'h DCA 1983); Blue v Weinstein ... immediate purpose other than that
for which it was designed. See, e.g., McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 and n. 1 (Fla. 4th
DCA 1983). Edwards, however
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01147552.pdf
EFTA01111295Set 9
2009-12-217p2,134w
undue expenditure of time and money did not
constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA
1983)(same); Blue v. Weinstein ... complaint and subsequent amendments); Della-Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055;
McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)(counterclaim for abuse of
process
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111295.pdf
EFTA00584338Set 9
2009-12-218p2,209w
undue expenditure of time and money did not
constitute abuse of process); McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4'h DCA
1983)(same); Blue ... complaint and subsequent amendments); Della-
Donna, 512 So. 2d at 1055; McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA
1983)(counterclaim for abuse of process
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00584338.pdf
EFTA00306384Set 9
2012-03-297p1,819w
spurious claim is not itself actionable as abuse of process, see, e.g.,
McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Blue v Weinstein ... immediate purpose other than that
for which it was designed. See, e.g., McMurray v. U-Haul Co., 425 So. 2d 1208 and n. I (Fla. 4th
DCA 1983). Edwards, however
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00306384.pdf
EFTA01100909Set 9
16p3,889w
Nova University, Inc., 512 So. 2d 1051,
1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); McMurray v. U-Haul Co, Inc., 425 So. 2d 1208, 1209-10 (Fla. 4th
DCA 1983). The filing ... Nova University, Inc., 512 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
4 McMurray v. U-Haul Co, Inc., 425 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
5 Valdes
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01100909.pdf