EFTA00067383Set 9
2009-03-2515p4,639w
incriminating evidence that can be used at trial. Id; Pillsbury Company
v. Conboy, 495 U.S. 248, 103 S.Ct. 608 (1983).
Certainly, if the USAO decides to prosecute EPSTEIN ... FLSD Docket 03'25'2009 Page 12 of 15
Page 12
v. Conbov, 495 U.S. 248, 103 S.Ct. 608 (1983). 5se also, Hubbell, supra, as to what is
encompassed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00067383.pdf
EFTA00097351Set 9
2016-04-188p1,494w
effort for itself, for
counsel, and for litigants." Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); accord Clinton v.
Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706-08 (1997); see also
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00097351.pdf
EFTA01144324Set 9
2015-04-1629p15,270w
that it simply forgot to incorporate expressly." Id. (quoting Mertens v. Hewitt Assocs.,
508 U.S. 248, 254 (1993), and Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Russell, 473 U.S
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01144324.pdf
EFTA01207766Set 9
2014-12-0127p20,908w
border and were within Amendment is reasonableness," Florida v. Jimeno, 500
the United States. U.S. 248, 250, III S.Ct. 1801, 114 L.Ed.2d 297 (1991)
(citing Katz v. United States
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01207766.pdf
EFTA00205624Set 9
2008-07-1137p11,998w
quoting Mertens I. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248, 254 (1993)); see
United States I. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th Cir. 2008) (declining to "to read additional
remedies" into
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205624.pdf
EFTA00205602Set 9
2008-07-1122p6,598w
quoting Mertens I. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248, 254 (1993)); see
United States I. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th Cir. 2008) (declining to "to read additional
remedies" into
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00205602.pdf
EFTA01081829Set 9
2013-07-05101p27,839w
quoting Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S. 248, 254 (1993)); see
United States v. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th Cir. 2008) (declining to "to read additional
remedies" into
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01081829.pdf
EFTA00106039Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,241w
Amendment
rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S.
248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00106039.pdf
EFTA00087230Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
Amendment
rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S.
248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087230.pdf
EFTA00010542Set 8
2019-06-2432p8,663w
remedies that it simply
forgot to incorporate expressly") (quoting Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S.
248, 254 (1993)); United States v. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00010542.pdf
EFTA00040664Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,030w
Amendment
rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S.
248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00040664.pdf
EFTA00066510Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
Amendment
rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S.
248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00066510.pdf
EFTA00087251Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
Amendment
rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S.
248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087251.pdf
EFTA00024724Set 8
2020-09-044p1,929w
justice pending the
completion of criminal prosecution. See Landis v. North Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 255 (1936); Kashi
v. Gratsos, 790 F.2d 1050, 1057 (2d Cir. 1986). Courts routinely
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00024724.pdf
EFTA00085709Set 9
2019-06-2435p9,342w
remedies that it simply
forgot to incorporate expressly") (quoting Mertens v. Hewitt Associates, 508 U.S.
248, 254 (1993)); United States v. Hunter, 548 F.3d 1308, 1315 (10th
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00085709.pdf