EFTA00015303Set 8
22p5,018w
Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 740 (1979) passim
United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (1974) 6
United States v. Di Re, 332 U.S. 581 (1948) 6
United States ... Thomas, 736 F.3d 54, 61 (1st Cir. 2013) (quoting United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S.
338, 346 (1974)).
' It is for this reason that this Court should grant Maxwell
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00015303.pdf
EFTA01248965Set 9
2015-02-2646p12,417w
Uniled States v. papers and in its in camera submission, the reasons
Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 94 S.Ct. 613, 38 M.2t1 underlying the need for the state grand jury records
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01248965.pdf
EFTA00186707Set 9
2006-09-0520p9,610w
United States v. papers and in its in camera submission, the reasons
Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 94 S.Ct. 613, 38 L.Ed.2d
underlying the need for the state grand jury
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00186707.pdf
EFTA01699638Set 10
2015-02-2637p11,485w
United Stares v. papers and in its in camera submission, the reasons
Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 94 S.Ct. 613, 38 L.Ed.2d underlying the need for the state grand jury
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01699638.pdf
EFTA00186748Set 9
2006-08-1820p9,233w
Milted States v. papers and in its in camera submission, the reasons
Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 94 S.Ct. 613, 38 L.Ed.2d underlying the need for the state grand jury
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00186748.pdf
EFTA00102999Set 9
2019-03-26239p78,398w
S.D.N.Y. Oct. 7, 2004) 208, 211
United States v. Calandra,
414 U.S. 338 (1974) 110
United States v. Laming,
968 F.2d 232 (2d Cir. 1992) 165
xi
EFTA00103010
United States
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00102999.pdf
EFTA01416838Set 10
2017-06-19122p23,787w
claims in one stroke." Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S.
338, 131 S. Ct.
2541, 2551, 180 L. Ed. 2d 374 (2011). The commonality requirement is met
here
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01416838.pdf
EFTA01207766Set 9
2014-12-0127p20,908w
metal table, id. at 15:7-16:5; Hr'g Ex.
United States, 308 U.S. 338, 341, 60 S.Ct. 266, 84 L.Ed. 1F-1H, and has windows that are tinted
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01207766.pdf
claims in one stroke." Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338, 131 S. Ct.
2541, 2551, 180 L. Ed. 2d 374 (2011). The commonality requirement is met here
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01372132.pdf