EFTA01099901Set 9
2006-07-2631p10,619w
Edwards, 162 F.3d 87 (3d Cir. 1998); and
generally, Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. 386, 390,1 LEd. 648, 1798 WL 587 (Calder) (1798).
The United States Constitution provides that ... amendments must be interpreted "to have real and
substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S, 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can be no doubt that
Congress recognized the prior statute
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01099901.pdf
EFTA00207677Set 9
2006-07-2636p12,694w
Edwards, 162 F.3d 87 (3d Cir. 1998); and
generally, Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. 386, 390, 1 L.Ed. 648, 1798 WL 587 (Calder) (1798).
The United States Constitution provides that ... amendments must be interpreted "to have real and
substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S. 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can be no doubt that
Congress recognized the prior statute
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207677.pdf
EFTA01100005Set 9
2006-07-2643p14,726w
Edwards, 162 F.3d 87 (3d Cir. 1998); and
generally, Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. 386, 390, 1 L.Ed. 648, 1798 WL 587 (Calder) (1798).
The United States Constitution provides that ... amendments must be interpreted "to have real and
substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can be no doubt that
Congress recognized the prior statute
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01100005.pdf
EFTA01099943Set 9
2006-07-2632p10,791w
Edwards, 162 F.3d 87 (3d Cir. 1998); and
generally, Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. 386, 390, 1 L.Ed. 648, 1798 WL 587 (Calder) (1798).
The United States Constitution provides that ... amendments must be interpreted "to have real and
substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S. 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can be no doubt that
Congress recognized the prior statute
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01099943.pdf
EFTA00800008Set 9
2007-04-2432p10,113w
intends its amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS, 514 U.S.
386, 397 (1995), and Pierce County v. Guillen, 537 U.S. 129, 145 (2003)(rejecting an argument
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00800008.pdf
EFTA00799975Set 9
2007-04-2433p10,181w
intends its amendment to have real and substantial effect." Stone v. INS, 514 U.S.
386, 397 (1995), and Pierce County v. Guillen, 537 U.S. 129, 145 (2003)(rejecting an argument
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00799975.pdf
EFTA00213246Set 9
2010-03-2929p9,525w
Edwards 162 F.3d 87 (3d Cir. 1998); and
generally, Calder v. Bull 3 U.S. 386, 390, 1 L.Ed. 648, 1798 WL 587 (Calder) (1798).
The United States Constitution provides that
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00213246.pdf
EFTA00207722Set 9
2010-03-2929p9,495w
Edwards 162 F.3d 87 (3d Cir. 1998); and
generally, Calder v. Bull 3 U.S. 386, 390, 1 L.Ed. 648, 1798 WL 587 (Calder) (1798).
The United States Constitution provides that
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00207722.pdf
EFTA00797875Set 9
1999-05-2627p11,765w
remediless in a court of equity." (internal quotations omitted) (quoting Deweese v. Reinhard, 165 U.S.
386, 390, 17 S.Ct. 340, 41 L.Ed. 757 (1897))).
WESTLAW © 2019 Thomson Reuters. No claim
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00797875.pdf
EFTA00221363Set 9
2009-05-1836p13,958w
amendments must be interpreted "to have real and substantial effect," Stone v. I.N.S., 514
U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can be no doubt that Congress recognized the prior statute
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221363.pdf
EFTA00078835Set 9
2011-04-0854p17,640w
States, 470 U.S.598, 607-08 (1985). See also Town of Newton v. Rummy, 480
U.S. 386, 396 (1987) ("[C]ourts normally must defer to prosecutorial decisions as to whom
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00078835.pdf
EFTA01045904Set 9
2017-05-186p3,209w
clear: No new statutory period results from an amended return (see, e.g., Badaracco, 464 U.S. 386 (1984),
aff'g 693 F.2d 298 (3d Cir. 1982)).
Disclosure
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01045904.pdf