EFTA00211776Set 9
2007-07-1026p13,262w
persons who used them.
F15 See, e.g., United States v. Doe , 465 U.S. 605, 612 (1984); In re Grand Jury Proceedings , 393 F.3d ... Justice O'Connor wrote a concurring opinion in United States v. Doe , 465 U.S. 605
(1984),
just to make explicit what is implicit in the analysis of that opinion; that ... States , 425 U.S. 391, 409-10
(1976); and citing United States v. Doe , 465 U.S. 605 (1984)); In m Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum , 1 F.3d
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211776.pdf
EFTA00617461Set 9
2017-05-226p2,527w
were authentic." I1 36 (internal
quotation marks omitted) (quoting United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605, 613 & (1984)).
3 M.
4 These include leaks that purport to describe classified briefings ... existence of any particular responsive documents. See United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605,
613 n.12 (1984) ("The most plausible inference to be drawn from the broad-sweeping subpoenas
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00617461.pdf
EFTA00222985Set 9
2007-07-107p2,927w
created by the persons who used them.
EFTA00222988
See, e.g., United States' Doe , 465 U.S. 605, 612 (1984); In re Grand Jury Proceedings , 393 F.3d
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00222985.pdf
EFTA01112365Set 9
2013-05-179p2,220w
essence, forcing Epstein to waive this
privilege. See United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605, 612 (1984); People v. Traylor, 23
Cal App.3d 323, 330 (1972) ("If the witness were
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01112365.pdf
EFTA00211802Set 9
2007-09-184p1,528w
compelled, (2) testimonial, and (3)
incriminating.") ( citing United States v. Doe , 465 U.S. 605, 612-14 (1984)); In re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas
Dated January 5, 1988 , 847 F.2d
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00211802.pdf
EFTA00234914Set 9
2007-09-188p1,337w
compelled, (2) testimonial, and (3) incriminating.") (citing United States'. Doe,
465 U.S. 605, 612-14 (1984)); In re Three Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated tannin', 5, 1988, 847
F.2d
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00234914.pdf
EFTA01073755Set 9
2009-10-1618p5,332w
part on other grounds sub nom. United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605, 608 n.3
(1984). Of course, in all these cases, tax returns were ordered produced even though
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01073755.pdf
EFTA01111222Set 9
2013-05-1718p5,126w
essence,
forcing Epstein to waive this privilege. See United States
v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605, 612 (1984);
People v. Traylor, 23 Cal App.3d 323, 330 (1972) ("If
the witness were
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111222.pdf
EFTA01107917Set 9
2009-10-1618p5,322w
part on other grounds sub nom. United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605, 608 n.3
(1984). Of course, in all these cases, tax returns were ordered produced even though
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01107917.pdf
EFTA01728788Set 10
2007-07-2522p3,288w
compelled, (2) testimonial,
and (3) incriminating.") (citing United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605, 612-14 (1984)); In re Three
Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated January 5, 1988, 847 F.2d
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01728788.pdf