EFTA00097331Set 9
2014-10-2420p4,558w
Lavender, 583 F.2d 630 (2d Cir. 1978) 2, 4
United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 5
United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12
United ... would have known was false except for his reckless disregard of the truth.
468 U.S. 897, 923 (1984).
Here, as explained in Maxwell's due process motion to suppress
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00097331.pdf
EFTA00097649Set 9
2014-10-2420p4,543w
Lavender, 583 F.2d 630 (2d Cir. 1978) 2, 4
United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 5
United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12
United ... would have known was false except for his reckless disregard of the truth.
468 U.S. 897, 923 (1984).
Here, as explained in Maxwell's due process motion to suppress
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00097649.pdf
EFTA00018997Set 8
2014-10-2420p4,647w
Lavender, 583 F.2d 630 (2d Cir. 1978) 2, 4
United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 5
United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12
United ... would have known was false except for his reckless disregard of the truth.
468 U.S. 897, 923 (1984).
Here, as explained in Maxwell's due process motion to suppress
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00018997.pdf
EFTA00100287Set 9
2014-10-2420p4,646w
Lavender, 583 F.2d 630 (2d Cir. 1978) 2, 4
United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984) 5
United States v. Oshatz, 700 F. Supp. 696 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) 12
United ... would have known was false except for his reckless disregard of the truth.
468 U.S. 897, 923 (1984).
Here, as explained in Maxwell's due process motion to suppress
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00100287.pdf
EFTA00087251Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
EFTA00087261
Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 446 (1984); United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 922 (1984). The Court
agrees that, at the very least, the exception to the exclusionary rule
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087251.pdf
EFTA00087230Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
EFTA00087240
Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 446 (1984); United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 922 (1984). The Court
agrees that, at the very least, the exception to the exclusionary rule
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087230.pdf
EFTA00040664Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,030w
EFTA00040674
Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 446 (1984); United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 922 (1984). The Court
agrees that, at the very least, the exception to the exclusionary rule
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00040664.pdf
EFTA00066510Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,032w
EFTA00066520
Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 446 (1984); United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 922 (1984). The Court
agrees that, at the very least, the exception to the exclusionary rule
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00066510.pdf
EFTA00106039Set 9
2016-02-2921p6,241w
Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 446 (1984); United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 922 (1984). The Court
agrees that, at the very least, the exception to the exclusionary rule
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00106039.pdf
EFTA00102999Set 9
2019-03-26239p78,398w
F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 2006) 33, 38, 46
United States v. Leon,
468 U.S. 897 (1984) 124, 125
United States v. Leonelli,
428 F. Supp. 880 (S.D.N.Y. 1977) 268
United
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00102999.pdf