""Unpersuasive"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

results for “"Unpersuasive"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

August 2013

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

EFTA00209657Set 9

2013-08-0575p16,720w

Finding that The Correspondence at Issue Did Not Fall Within Rule 410 Are Unpersuasive 24 ii EFTA00209661 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/05/2013 Page: 6 of 75 II. THE COURT ... Finding that The Correspondence at Issue Did Not Fall Within Rule 410 Are Unpersuasive. The district court advanced two reasons for its conclusion that the correspondence at issue ... plea of guilty in state court, DE188:4-5. Both reasons are equally unpersuasive. As for the first reason, "[t]o determine whether a discussion should be characterized

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209657.pdf

EFTA01134321Set 9

2013-06-1858p13,086w

Finding that The Correspondence at Issue Did Not Fall Within Rule 410 Are Unpersuasive. The district court advanced two reasons for its conclusion that the correspondence at issue ... plea of guilty in state court, DE188:4-5. Both reasons are equally unpersuasive. As for the first reason, "[t]o determine whether a discussion should be characterized

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01134321.pdf

EFTA00104411Set 9

defendants immunity"). The Court should apply the same analysis here. The government also argues unpersuasively that the framework Ms. Maxwell proposes would create a "confusing" rule of interpretation that would ... plea agreement, not the Double Jeopardy Clause. (Opp. at 10-11). This argument is unpersuasive. The defendant's wife argued on appeal both that the Double Jeopardy Clause

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00104411.pdf

EFTA01072194Set 9

2013-06-1858p13,073w

Finding that The Correspondence at Issue Did Not Fall Within Rule 410 Are Unpersuasive. The district court advanced two reasons for its conclusion that the correspondence at issue ... plea of guilty in state court, DE188:4-5. Both reasons are equally unpersuasive. As for the first reason, "[t]o determine whether a discussion should be characterized

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01072194.pdf

EFTA01063319Set 9

2017-02-2211p8,936w

Rejection of Mr. Wachter's valuations We find Mr. Wachter's valuations unreliable and unpersuasive for several reasons. First, he had a significant conflict of interest that could cause ... auction sale data from 2001, 2004, and 2005. Mr. Wachter Is, again, unpersuasive. As before, we reject his "cleaning risk" thesis as exaggerated as to any value diminution. Mr. Cardile

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01063319.pdf

EFTA00105599Set 9

2021-02-1015p4,181w

Government's attempt to distance itself from these records is both disingenuous and unpersuasive (Gov't Reply Br., at 14), since the documents would facilitate public oversight and shed light

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105599.pdf

EFTA00070830Set 9

2018-11-297p2,189w

Under that standard, the Government's arguments for exceptional circumstances and compelling need are unpersuasive. The Government argues that it needs the protected documents because issuing subpoenas to other sources

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00070830.pdf

EFTA01363330Set 10

2010-05-261p560w

legal team and financial resources. North Shore's explanations for its delays are unpersuasive. By failing to file an appellant's brief or timely move for an extension of time

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01363330.pdf

EFTA00102999Set 9

2019-03-26239p78,398w

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA S120

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00102999.pdf

EFTA00090200Set 9

2021-11-1023p6,135w

about first? 4 MR. DeMARCO: I did consult with the government. I 5 was unpersuasive. I was hoping to be more successful with your 6 Honor. 7 THE COURT

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00090200.pdf

EFTA00077281Set 9

2020-05-066p2,600w

widely criticized the Prince following the BBC interview for his lack of sympathy and unpersuasive denials. As a result, on Nov. 20, 2019, the Prince issued a statement announcing that

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00077281.pdf

EFTA00077287Set 9

2019-11-164p2,713w

Epstein view for his lack of sympathy and EFTA00077287 litiolorktaflawild THURSDAY, MAY 6, 2020 unpersuasive denials. As a result, Then, on March 9, 2020, at a personnel studiously refrain from

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00077287.pdf

EFTA00209385Set 9

2014-04-1824p5,738w

from evidence." Id. at 109,130 S. Ct. at 606-07. The Court found unpersuasive that these disclosures may "have implications beyond the case at hand" and ruled that, although

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209385.pdf

EFTA02691163Set 11

2011-07-0540p12,238w

YouTube as "Hamza Al Khatib-Truth of his Death." I cite it despite its unpersuasive tone and its unpopularity. Several other videos on Hamza are dramatically sympathetic to him, highly

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02691163.pdf

EFTA00808436Set 9

2018-11-2819p3,984w

Untimely Request for an Evidentiary Hearing to Comply with an Inapplicable Statute is Unpreserved, Unpersuasive, and Must be Rejected Plaintiffs ask this Court for remand and an evidentiary hearing that

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00808436.pdf

EFTA00209632Set 9

2014-04-1824p5,766w

from evidence." Id. at 109,130 S. Ct. at 606-07. The Court found unpersuasive that these disclosures may "have implications beyond the case at hand" and ruled that, although

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00209632.pdf

EFTA00089986Set 9

2021-11-1023p6,348w

about first? 4 MR. DeMARCO: I did consult with the government. I 5 was unpersuasive. I was hoping to be more successful with your 6 Honor. 7 THE COURT

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00089986.pdf

EFTA01197325Set 9

2014-04-1824p5,755w

from evidence." Id. at 109,130 S. Ct. at 606-07. The Court found unpersuasive that these disclosures may "have implications beyond the case at hand" and ruled that, although

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01197325.pdf

EFTA00797875Set 9

1999-05-2627p11,765w

what little known legislative produces principled decisions. history there is I find inapposite and unpersuasive. Accordingly, I believe it This court has in the past expressly is our duty

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00797875.pdf

EFTA00089154Set 9

2020-12-0834p11,257w

United States and her behavior after Epstein's arrest that the Court already found unpersuasive. To the extent the Renewed Bail Application presents new information, it consists primarily of financial

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00089154.pdf

Page 1

Results by Dataset50 total

Set 8

7

Set 9

38

Set 10

4

Set 11

1