EFTA00801479Set 9
2016-08-0819p2,944w
Edwards's Interrogatories undeniably seek Epstein's protected work
product. In SurfDrugs. Inc. v. Vermette. 236 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1970), the Florida Supreme
Edwards' list of trial witnesses fails ... Interrogatories are, unquestionably, demanding protected work product as defined by the
Florida Supreme Court. Vermette. 236 So. 2d at 112. "The rationale supporting the work
product doctrine is that
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00801479.pdf
EFTA00801563Set 9
2013-10-187p1,758w
Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301• 954.467.1223
EFTA00801566
product. In Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1970), the Florida Supreme
Court provided this general definition of what ... Interrogatories are, unquestionably, demanding protected work product as defined by the
Florida Supreme Court. Vermette, 236 So. 2d at 112. "The rationale supporting the work
product doctrine is that
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00801563.pdf
EFTA01111246Set 9
2010-03-2330p8,316w
Exhibit 1.
Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d
108, 112 (Fla. 1970), gave this general definition of work product saying
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01111246.pdf
EFTA01103276Set 9
2011-05-239p2,023w
citing Dodson v. Persell, 390 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 1980); SurfDrugs, Inc. v. Vermette,
236 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1970)).
10. In Elkins, the Florida Supreme Court commented
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01103276.pdf
EFTA01128665Set 9
2010-03-2321p5,588w
Exhibit
Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Surftiny, Inc v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d 108,112 (Fla. 1970), gave this
14
EFTA01128678
Case No. SO 2009CA040800XXXXMB AG
general
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01128665.pdf
EFTA00728126Set 9
2009-09-0211p3,091w
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure
1.280(b)(1); see also Surf Drugs, Inc., v. Vermette, 236 So.2d 108, 111 (Fla.
1970)(stating that the rules of discovery should be afforded
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00728126.pdf
EFTA00606624Set 9
2010-03-2332p8,686w
Exhibit 1.
Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d
108, 112 (Fla. 1970), gave this general definition of work product saying
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00606624.pdf
EFTA01119089Set 9
2010-03-2330p8,192w
Exhibit 1.
Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Surf rugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d
108, 112 (Fla. 1970), gave this general definition of work product saying
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01119089.pdf
EFTA00583806Set 9
2011-05-236p1,635w
citing Dodson v. Pend!, 390 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 1980); Suif Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette,
-
"S
236 So. 2d 108 (Fla. 1970)).
,r‘
II. In Elkins, the Florida Supreme Court
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00583806.pdf
EFTA01069498Set 9
2010-03-2332p8,670w
Exhibit 1.
Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d
108, 112 (Fla. 1970), gave this general definition of work product saying
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01069498.pdf
EFTA00221210Set 9
2008-09-1012p2,938w
Florida Rule of Civil Procedure
1.280(b)(1); see also Surf Drugs, Inc., v. Vermette, 236 So.2d 108, 111 (Fla.
1970)(stating that the rules of discovery should be afforded
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00221210.pdf