EFTA00726931Set 9
2010-07-0220p15,549w
prohibition on after-the-fact increases in punishment. United States v Gibson (2009, CA10 Wyo) 2009 US App LEXIS
22042.
Unpublished: 18 USCS§ 2250(a)(2)(8) is proper exercise ... remains well within constitutional boundaries of Commerce Clause. United States v Gibson (2009,
CA10 Wyo) 2009 US App LEXIS 22042.
Unpublished: Sex-offender lacked standing to assert argument that ... such argument concerned rights of state, not individuals. United States v Gibson (2009, CA10 Wyo)
2009 US App LEXIS 22042.
Unpublished: Fact that defendant's sex offense predated Sex Offender
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00726931.pdf