EFTA00013373Set 8
1995-01-3116p7,230w
matter, admissible under
v. Fulk, 816 F.2d 1202, 1205 (7th Cir.1987). The
Rule 801(dX2)(E).
government has two reasons why the adverse spousal
testimony privilege will not apply: first ... charged
The court reserves the factual determinations necessary to
conspiracy (and therefore Rule 801(dX2)(E) does not
rule on the privileges until trial, and accordingly denies
apply), the proposed ... defendant's motion in this regard.
1~~1 Since this is not an 801(dX2)(E) admission, issues
arise under Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88
S.Ct
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013373.pdf
EFTA00235326Set 9
2007-09-12360p73,193w
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
D CASE NO.
18 U.S.C. § 1512(dX2)
18 U.S.C. § 113(aX5)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
R
Defendant.
The United ... federal offense; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(dX2) and 2.
2. The defendant agrees and understands that the above charges involve his
conduct ... federal offense; in violation
of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1512(dX2) and 2.
2. The defendant agrees and understands that the above charges involve his
conduct
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00235326.pdf