EFTA02693109Set 11
2011-01-0710p6,243w
contrast to
the calibration phase. the LPC (5) played a minor role, and the IPL (6) played a major role.
73 4% and 5.4O 0.27 s. The change ... involvement, and subject training requirements of our target acquisition phase
the inferior parietal lobule (IPL) made a large contribution to only a single brief practice session (-20 mint
(figure ... brain-controlled cursor
correlations were low (table 3). velocity were with the PIG, PoG, IPL and LPC. There was
7
EFTA_R1_02038195
EFTA02693116
I. Neural
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02693109.pdf
EFTA02693161Set 11
2009-03-0410p7,991w
contral- kinematic parameters for neuroprosthetic control (Schwartz et al..
ateral inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and ipsilateral medial frontal gyrus. 2001). Furthermore, the salient region of high activation over ... phases of PET studies of visuomotor adaptation. The left PrG. PoG. and IPL have
adaptation, and the differences in MEG sensor importance between been shown to be involved during visuomotor ... natural, multi-joint center-out movements. environments while the SMA, lateral premotor cortex. and IPL encode
and. furthermore, does so during adaptation to a screen cursor-hand for hand velocity
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02693161.pdf