Epstein Files Search

EFTA00013373Set 8

1995-01-3116p7,230w

communications privilege; (8) references to one of defendants in codefendants' conversations did not implicate confrontation clause; and (9) government could introduce evidence of incarceration 19 Criminal ... after alleged drug distribution and money Richard Messina. laundering conspiracy ended did not implicate confrontation clause; references required Douglas P. Roller, Naperville, IL, E.E. Edwards, III, "linkage" to defendant before ... L.Ed.2d 476 (1968). "[A] defendant is deprived of his rights under the Confrontation Clause C. Michael Gubbins when his nontestifying codefendant's confession naming 1311 As the briefing came

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00013373.pdf

EFTA00105542Set 9

2016-02-129p2,008w

bias and motive for fabrication to protect Ms. Maxwell's rights under the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution. A criminal defendant "states a violation of the Confrontation Clause

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00105542.pdf

EFTA00040126Set 9

2016-02-129p1,960w

bias and motive for fabrication to protect Ms. Maxwell's rights under the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution. A criminal defendant "states a violation of the Confrontation Clause

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00040126.pdf

EFTA00085259Set 9

2021-03-227p3,872w

general issues of bias and motive for fabrication, as is her right under the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution. Letter from L. Menninger to Hon. Lorna G. Schofield

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00085259.pdf

EFTA00099080Set 9

2019-10-179p2,264w

request 15 potentially implicates the defendant's right under the Sixth 16 Amendment's confrontation clause which guarantees defendants 17 the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses. The Second

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00099080.pdf

EFTA00208106Set 9

2011-04-079p2,411w

Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (1987), the Supreme Court recognized that the Confrontation Clause grants a criminal defendant a trial right to cross- examine a witness. It hastened

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00208106.pdf

EFTA00023369Set 8

2019-10-179p2,264w

request 15 potentially implicates the defendant's right under the Sixth 16 Amendment's confrontation clause which guarantees defendants 17 the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses. The Second

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00023369.pdf

EFTA00102335Set 9

2019-10-179p2,264w

request 15 potentially implicates the defendant's right under the Sixth 16 Amendment's confrontation clause which guarantees defendants 17 the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses. The Second

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00102335.pdf

EFTA00087185Set 9

2019-10-179p2,246w

request 15 potentially implicates the defendant's right under the Sixth 16 Amendment's confrontation clause which guarantees defendants 17 the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses. The Second

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00087185.pdf