""the Court ordered Plaintiffs"" — Epstein Files Search

Search Entities About Settings

/to search

Dataset

Sort

Status

DOJ Status

Date Range

–

Page Count

–

10 results for “"the Court ordered Plaintiffs"”

Keyboard Shortcuts

/

Focus search

Esc

Blur input

O

Open PDF

←→

Paginate

EFTA00307562Set 9

2011-05-2411p3,281w

unnecessary proceedings. Charles v. Daley, 799 F.2d 343, 348 (7th Cir. 1986). This Court ordered Plaintiffs to amend the Complaint to add Molyneux as a party for three reasons

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00307562.pdf

EFTA00788364Set 9

2017-10-1919p6,183w

good grounds therefore states as follows: 1. On October 5, 2016, this Court ordered Plaintiffs to effect service on Mr. Epstein within 120 days of the date of that order

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00788364.pdf

EFTA00800147Set 9

2017-10-1618p5,835w

good grounds therefore states as follows: 1. On October 5, 2016, this Court ordered Plaintiffs to effect service on Mr. Epstein within 120 days of the date of that order

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00800147.pdf

EFTA00797675Set 9

2018-09-1413p3,780w

only service attempt on Epstein since filing of the Amended Complaint, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to effect service of process on Epstein within 120 days (i.e., by no later than

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00797675.pdf

EFTA01299150Set 10

2013-10-0235p11,136w

abundance of caution and at the defendants' request, the Court ordered plaintiff deposed in order that the underlying nature of his claim was more readily imderstood. As a result

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01299150.pdf

EFTA01407289Set 10

2016-10-1258p10,240w

abundance of caution and at the defendants' request, the Court ordered plaintiff deposed in order that the underlying nature of his claim was more readily understood. As a result

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01407289.pdf

EFTA00610037Set 9

2016-10-056p1,511w

good grounds therefore states as follows: 1. On October 5, 2016, this Court ordered Plaintiffs to effect service on Mr. Epstein within 120 days of the date of that order

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00610037.pdf

EFTA01734801Set 10

2016-09-068p2,140w

E.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 2007) (dismissing case where, after court order, Plaintiff refused to turn over confidential settlement agreement relevant to the pending litigation)); see also Laforest v. Honeywell Intl

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01734801.pdf

EFTA00593012Set 9

2015-12-092p264w

Plaintiffs failure to provide a privilege log is hereby denied. However, the court orders Plaintiffs to provide an itemized privilege log within 30 days. DONE AND ORDERED in Broward County

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00593012.pdf

EFTA00618132Set 9

2016-06-0615p4,066w

withheld as privileged and logged by Plaintiff." Id. On April 21, 2016, the Court Ordered Plaintiff to provide complete responses to the interrogatory regarding identification of her attorneys

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA00618132.pdf

Corpus: 1990-03-17 – 2025-12-01

May 2011

Mo

Tu

We

Th

Fr

Sa

Su

None

Light

Medium

Heavy

Results by Dataset10 total

Set 9

7

Set 10

3